Advanced Search
CS Search Google Search
Subscribers, please login

Published Articles >> Table of Contents >> Abstract

Publication Home Page
August 1989 (Vol. 11, No. 8)   pp. 873-885
Effects of Sample Size in Classifier Design

Full Article Text: Download PDF of full textBuy this articleGet full text from IEEE Xplore

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/34.31448
Send link to a friend

Abstract
The effect of finite sample-size on parameter estimates and their subsequent use in a family of functions are discussed. General and parameter-specific expressions for the expected bias and variance of the functions are derived. These expressions are then applied to the Bhattacharyya distance and the analysis of the linear and quadratic classifiers, providing insight into the relationship between the number of features and the number of training samples. Because of the functional form of the expressions, an empirical approach is presented to enable asymptotic performance to be accurately estimated using a very small number of samples. Results were experimentally verified using artificial data in controlled cases and using real, high-dimensional data.
References
[1] T. S. El-Sheikh and A. G. Wacker, "Effect of dimensionality and estimation on the performance of Gaussian classifiers,"Pattern Recognition, vol. 12, pp. 115-126, 1980.
[2] A. K. Jain and B. Chandrasekaran, "Dimensionality and sample size considerations in pattern recognition practice," inHandbook of Statistics, vol. 2, P. R. Krishnaiah and L. N. Kanal, Eds, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, 1982, pp. 835-855.
[3] S. Raudys and V. Pikelis, "On dimensionality, sample size, classification error, and complexity of classification algorithm in pattern recognition,"IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. PAMI- 2, no. 3, pp. 242-252, May 1980.
[4] C. P. Han, "Distribution of discriminant function in circular models,"Inst. Star. Math. Ann., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 117-125, 1970.
[5] G. J. McLachlan, "Some expected values for the error rates of the sample quadratic discriminant function,"Australian J. Stat., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 161-165, 1975.
[6] H. V. Pipberger, "Computer analysis of electrocardiogram," inClinical Electrocardiography and Computers, C. A. Caceres and L. S. Dreifus, Eds. New York: Academic, 1970, pp. 109-119.
[7] A. K. Jain, "On an estimate of the Bhattacharyya distance,"IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., pp. 763-766, Nov. 1976.
[8] H. M. Kalayeh and D. A. Landgrebe, "Predicting the required number of training samples,"IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. PAMI-5, no. 6, pp. 664-667, Nov. 1983.
[9] D. M. Foley, "Considerations of sample and feature size,"IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-18, pp. 618-626, 1972.
[10] K. Fukunaga,Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. New York: Academic, 1972.
[11] L. Novak, "On the sensitivity of Bayes and Fisher classifiers in radar target detection," inProc. 18th Asilomar Conf. Circuits, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 5-7, 1984.
[12] W. Beyer,CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1981, pp. 44-45.
Additional Information
Index Terms- pattern recognition; classifier; design; sample-size; parameter estimates; bias; variance; Bhattacharyya distance; parameter estimation; pattern recognition

Citation:  K. Fukunaga, R.R. Hayes, "Effects of Sample Size in Classifier Design," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 11,  no. 8,  pp. 873-885,  Aug.,  1989

RSS Feed

Similar Articles

Abstract Contents
Abstract
References
Index Terms
Citation




Free access to

  • Abstracts
  • Selected PDFs

Electronic subscribers login to:

  • Access HTML/PDFs of full text articles

Subscription information

Get a Web account

PDFs require Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Peer Review Notice

Give us Feedback