Advanced Search
CS Search Google Search
Subscribers, please login

Published Articles >> Table of Contents >> Abstract

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)   pp. 324-333
Comparing Size Measures for Predicting Web Application Development Effort: A Case Study

Full Article Text: Download PDF of full textBuy this article

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.33
Send link to a friend

Abstract
Size represents one of the most important attribute of software products used to predict software development effort. In the past nine years, several measures have been proposed to estimate the size of Web applications, and it is important to determine which one is most effective to predict Web development effort. To this aim in this paper we report on an empirical analysis where, using data from 15 Web projects developed by a software company, we compare four sets of size measures, using two prediction techniques, namely Forward Stepwise Regression (SWR) and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). All the measures provided good predictions in terms of MMRE, MdMRE, and Pred(0.25) statistics, for both SWR and CBR. Moreover, when using SWR, Length measures and Web Objects gave significant better results than Functional measures, however presented similar results to the Tukutuku measures. As for CBR, results did not show any significant differences amongst the four sets of size measures.
Additional Information

Citation:  Sergio Di Martino, Filomena Ferrucci, Carmine Gravino, Emilia Mendes, "Comparing Size Measures for Predicting Web Application Development Effort: A Case Study," esem, pp. 324-333,  First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007),  2007

Similar Articles

Abstract Contents
Abstract
Citation




Free access to

  • Abstracts
  • Selected PDFs

Electronic subscribers login to:

  • Access HTML/PDFs of full text articles

Subscription information

Get a Web account

PDFs require Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Peer Review Notice

Give us Feedback