Advanced Search
CS Search Google Search
Subscribers, please login

Published Articles >> Table of Contents >> Abstract

Third International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG'06)   pp. 370-374
Overlap Among Major Web Search Engines

Full Article Text: Download PDF of full textBuy this article

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ITNG.2006.105
Send link to a friend

Abstract
Our study examined the overlap among results retrieved by three major Web search engines for a large set of more than 10,316 queries. Previous smaller studies have discussed the lack of overlap in results returned by Web search engines for the same queries. Our large-scale study measured the overlap of first page results (both nonsponsored and sponsored) across three major Web search engines ― Google, Ask Jeeves and Yahoo - using a large number of randomly selected Dogpile.com queries submitted within a 24 hour - 36 hour period. We then compared the results to results retrieved for the same queries from the meta-search engine Dogpile.com. The percent of total results unique to only one of the three major Web search engines was 85%. 12% of total search results were found on two of the three Web search engines, and 3% of results were found across all three Web search engines. This small level of overlap reflects major differences in Web search engines retrieval and ranking results. Results point to the value of meta-search engines in Web retrieval to overcome the biases of individual search engines.
Additional Information

Citation:  Amanda Spink, Bernard J. Jansen, Chris Blakely, Sherry Koshman, "Overlap Among Major Web Search Engines," itng, pp. 370-374,  Third International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG'06),  2006

Similar Articles

Abstract Contents
Abstract
Citation




Free access to

  • Abstracts
  • Selected PDFs

Electronic subscribers login to:

  • Access HTML/PDFs of full text articles

Subscription information

Get a Web account

PDFs require Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Peer Review Notice

Give us Feedback