|
Published Articles >> Table of Contents >> Abstract
March/April 2006 (Vol. 10, No. 2)
pp. 51-57
Extending RSVP for Quality of Security Service
ZhengYou Xia, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China
YunAn Hu, IBM Corporation China
Full Article Text:
   
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIC.2006.27
Send link to a friend
| Abstract |
|
The Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) lets hosts request quality of (bandwidth) service for multicast applications on the Internet. As network equipment advances to provide improved bandwidth service, security service becomes the more critical problem. However, RSVP doesn't provide a flexible mechanism to support quality of security service (QoSS). Security service RSVP extends RSVP to provide the needed mechanism for dynamically negotiating QoSS among the senders and receivers of multicast applications on the Internet. SSRSVP provides different QoSS resolutions according to receiver nodes' security service needs.
|
 References
|
[1] L. Zhang et al., "RSVP: A New Resource Reservation Protocol," IEEE Network, vol. 7, no. 5, Sept. 1993, pp. 8–18.
[2] R. Braden et al., Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) — Version 1 Functional Specification, IETF RFC 2205, Sept. 1997; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc2205.txt.
[3] R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview, IETF RFC 1633, June 1994; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc1633.txt.
[4] J. Wroclawski, The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services, IETF RFC 2210, Sept. 1997; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc2210.txt.
[5] E.C. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, and R. Callon, Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture, IETF RFC 3031, Jan. 2001; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc3031.txt.
[6] E Mannie ed., "Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture," IETF Internet draft, work in progress, Aug. 2002.
[7] D. Awduche et al., RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, IETF RFC 3209, Dec. 2001, www.ietf.org/rfcrfc3209.txt.
[8] L. Berger, ed., Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions, IETF RFC 3473, Jan. 2003; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc3473.txt.
[9] G.-S. Kuo and Po-Chang Ko, "Dynamic RSVP Protocol," IEEE Comm., vol. 41, May 2003, pp. 130–135.
[10] F. Baker and P. Bose, "QoS Signaling in a Nested Virtual Private Network," IETF Internet draft, work in progress, Oct. 2005.
[11] B. Pratik, D. Voce, and D. Gokhale, "QoS for Aggregated Flows in VPN," Proc. Int'l Workshop Quality of Service (IWQOS), LNCS 3552, Springer-Verlag, 2005, pp. 392–394.
[12] L. Berger and T. O'Malley, RSVP Extensions for IPSec Data Flows, IETF RFC 2207, Sept. 1997; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc2207.txt.
[13] C. Irvine and T. Levin, "Quality of Security Service," Proc. New Security Paradigms Workshop, ACM Press, 2000, pp. 91–99.
[14] M. Handley and V. Jacobson, SDP: Session Description Protocol, IETF RFC 2327, Apr. 1998; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc2327.txt.
[15] F. Baker, B. Lindell, and M. Talwar, RSVP Cryptographic Authentication, IETF RFC 2747, Jan. 2000; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc2747.txt.
|
 Additional Information
|
Index Terms- RSVP security service, multicast, quality of security service, security negotiation, Qos
Citation:
ZhengYou Xia, YunAn Hu,
"Extending RSVP for Quality of Security Service,"
IEEE Internet Computing,
vol. 10,
no. 2,
pp. 51-57,
Mar/Apr,
2006
|
|
RSS Feed