Home  |   Login  |   Logout  |   Access Information  |   Alerts  |   Purchase History  |   Cart  |   Sitemap  |   Help   
 
CrossRef Search
BROWSE SEARCH IEEE XPLORE GUIDE SUPPORT
You requested this document:
1. Procedure and Dynamic Display Relocation on Performance in a Multitask Environment
Hancock, P. A.;
Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions on
Volume 37,  Issue 1,  Jan. 2007 Page(s):47 - 57
Abstract:

In this paper, the responses of experienced professional pilots to change in interface configuration and differing automated invocation procedures were examined using a simulated flight-task environment. Performance was evaluated on three subtasks: two-dimensional compensatory tracking; fuel management; and systems monitoring. The status of automation, which was available for tracking and fuel management only, was conveyed by a change in display configuration represented by either a reduction in the size of the relevant display or by a reduction in size accompanied by its displacement to a peripheral spatial location. Combined with these interface-configuration changes were two forms of automation invocation procedure, which were pilot-initiated automation and system-initiated automation. Each was compared to a standard manual-control condition. Results indicated several response asymmetries. While tracking showed no effect for the location of the automated fuel-management display, fuel-management performance did reveal a significant effect, which favored the peripheral location of the automated tracking display. This display-location effect is thought to result from a general requirement for pilots to change their visual-scan pattern. The converse effect does not appear for fuel management and represents the continued primacy given by the pilots to tracking performance. System-initiated automation of fuel management, as a set condition, resulted in significantly better tracking performance, in both mean and variability measures, when compared to pilot-initiated automation. In the converse situation, involving the automation of the tracking subtask, a significant difference was also evident, but only in the variance measure of the fuel-management performance. The fuel-management variance for the pilot-initiated automation of tracking was significantly lower than that for the condition where the automation was enacted by the system. These results indicate that the au- tomation-initiation process itself influences
Abstract | Full Text: PDF(302 KB)    IEEE JNL
 
» Key
IEEE JNL IEEE Journal or Magazine
IEE JNL IEE Journal or Magazine
IEEE CNF IEEE Conference Proceeding
IEE CNF IEE Conference Proceeding
IEEE STD IEEE Standard
 
 
Indexed by IEE Inspec
© Copyright 2008 IEEE – All Rights Reserved